Monthly Archives: March 2011

One More Reason Patients Ask Doctors So Few Questions

The most popular post on my blog is entitled Five Reasons Why People Do Not Ask Their Doctor Questions. Well it seems there is a sixth reason.

The Reason?

I am forever reminded of this when I see my retinal surgeon for follow-up for my surgery to fix a recently detached retina.   Every time I try and ask a question, I am told to wait until he’s finished with the exam…at which point I have forgotten the question.

Turns out today’s “medical exam” (aka medical interview) is actually a highly structured process which has changed little in many ways since its inception in the early 1900s.  Both the patient and physician have defined roles which have evolved over time.

The physician’s role is that of scientist and problem solver.  He or she listens, albeit often briefly, to the patient’s presenting complaints.  Next they examine the patient asking questions as they go along. Then comes a working diagnosis followed by tests (if needed), then a treatment plan is presented to the patient and viola…the physician is out the door.

The patient’s role in the medical exam is two-fold: 1) present their problems in a clear and concise fashion and 2) answer the physician’s questions when asked.  That’s it.  Remember it’s all about arriving at a diagnosis and treatment.  In fact the patient’s opening statement – describing their reason for the visit – is the only place in the medical exam where patients are supposed to talk freely.

Otherwise, if not explicitly asked by the physician, most patients, including “empowered patients,” are unlikely to bring up unvoiced concerns, expectations or questions.  After all who wants to interrupt their doctor.  There is just no place in the medical exam process formally designated for patient questions.  It isn’t that they are unimportant; they are just not needed by the physician to make a diagnosis.

All the talk about patient-centered care aside, the medical exam is a physician-directed affair.  Research shows that primary care physicians on average dominating 60% of available visit talk time.  The predominant communication style employed by the majority of primary care physicians is what is called biomedical.  This style relies on closed ended questions, evidence and hard science to arrive at a diagnosis and treatment plan.  In studies using conversational analysis (audio-recording and coding of physician-patient exchanges during the medical exam) patient questions are the least frequent form of patient verbal utterance during the typical office visit.

To be sure, the medical exam as taught in medical school over the last 5 years has taken on a more patient-centered orientation.   But physicians are busy people.  Like the rest of us, busy physicians gravitate to what will get us where we need to be in the least amount of time.  Unfortunately that means little time for unscripted patient questions.

That’s what I think.  What do you think?

Sources:

Kaplan CB, Siegel B, Madill JM, Epstein RM. Communication and the Medical Interview Strategies for Learning and Teaching.; 49-55.

Putnam SM, Stiles WB, Jacob MC, James S a. Patient exposition and physician explanation in initial medical interviews and outcomes of clinic visits. Medical Care. 1985;23(1):74-83.

Cegala DJ, Street RL, Clinch CR. The impact of patient participation on physiciansʼ information provision during a primary care medical interview. Health Communication. 2007;21(2):177-85.

Patient Satisfaction and Doctor Requests – What’s the Score?

My favorite blog, besides Mind the Gap, is KevinMD.com.  It’s not just because they let me do a guest post now and then.  I like it because it is a great place to interact with lots of other readers, particularly physicians.
 
Last week, KevinMD picked upon my post here on empathy or should I say the lack of it.   True to form, I received some engaging comments.   One comment in particular caught my attention.  The contributor for some reason equated “being empathetic” with “giving in” to patient requests presumably during routine office visits.  Here’s a direct quote:
 

Give the patients what they want! Antibiotics are OK for colds. The patients want them. So what if narcotic-addicted patients get more pain medication. That’s what they want. Why make a big deal about a patient’s weight or a patient’s smoking habits? It will upset them.

 
It then struck me that I hear variations on this theme quite often from physicians.   I interpret this to mean that some physicians are afraid that saying no to a patient request may negatively impact their patient satisfaction scores.   I can see why one would be concerned about this issue so I did a little research to see where the truth lay.
 
First of all, patient requests are not uncommon.  For example, a sample of 200 patients (closed panel HMO) generated 256 requests for service, e.g., medications, tests, and specialty referrals.  Treating physicians complied with most frequently with patient requests for medications (75.6%) and tests (71.4%) more frequently than expectations for referrals (40.8%).  So what was the impact of these physicians “saying no” figuratively and literally on patient satisfaction and patient trust?  Nothing. Patient satisfaction and trust in their physician remained high regardless of whether patient expectations were met or not.
 
When patients make requests, I really wonder what they are asking for.   Do they really want/need that antidepressant which they ask for u name or do they just want their physician to listen to them; yes even empathize with them? After all, the number one complaint of patients is that their doctors don’t listen to them.  Do patients make requests because they worry that their doctor is too busy to notice a problem like anxiety or depression?  I suspect that negotiating patient requests is not a big concern in physician practices characterized by strong patient-physician relationships and high quality physician-patient communications.  I could be wrong…
 
What do you think?
 
Sources:

Koropchak CM, Tulsky JA. Behind Closed Doors – Management of Patient Expectations in Primary Care Practices. Archives of Internal Medicine. 2007;167:445-452.

Vega CP. The Satisfied Patient – Overprescribed and Costly. Medscape Family Medicine. 2010:3-6.

If Evidence Really Mattered, Physicians Would Be More Empathetic With Patients

Is anyone else tired of hearing about how important empathy is in the physician-patient relationship?  Every other day it seems a new study is talking about the therapeutic value of empathy.  Enough already!

It’s not that I don’t believe that empathy is important, I do.  I also believe the data that links physician empathy with improved patient outcomes, increased satisfaction, and better patient experiences.

A recent study released in Academic Medicine reported that “patients of physicians with high empathy scores were significantly more likely to have good control over their blood sugar as well as cholesterol, while the inverse was true for patients of physicians with low scores.”

Finding findings from this study by Hojat et al are consistent with a 2009 study by Rakel et al which found that among patients with the common cold those with physicians displaying high empathy had a significantly shorter duration of illness and trend toward lesser severity of illness and higher levels of immune response, compared to those patient whose physician displayed less empathy.

Going back further, in a 2001 review of 25 randomly controlled studies that looked at the influence of the practitioner-patient interac­tions outcomes , Di Blasi et al concluded that:

One relatively consistent finding is that physicians who adopt a warm, friendly, and reassuring manner are more effective than those who keep consul­tations formal and do not offer reassurance.

The problem with empathy research is that no one, including doctors, seems to be any paying attention as attested to the fact that nothing has changed.  Research documenting the therapeutic value of empathy goes back at least 20 years.  Despite the evidence, it seems that physicians are no more empathetic today than when people first started researching empathy.

Today we are told the health care is supposed to be evidence –based.   I wish that was the case when it came to empathy and the physician-patient relationship.  If it were we would have a lot more empathetic physicians, healthier patients, and much more satisfying patient experiences.

What do you think?

Sources:

Hojat, M. et al. Physicians’ Empathy and Clinical Outcomes for Diabetic Patients. Academic Medicine March 2011 – Volume 86 – Issue 3 – pp 359-364.

Rakel, D. et al. Practitioner Empathy and the Duration of the Common Cold.  Family Medicine, 2009;41(7):494-501.

Di Blasi, Z. et al. Influence of context effects on health outcomes: a systematic review. Lancet 2001;357(9258):757-62.